MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293662930 · doi:10.1002/path.6006

The proteome of clear cell ovarian carcinoma

2022· article· en· W4293662930 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer X. Ji, Dawn R. Cochrane, Gian Luca Negri, Shane Colborne, Sandra E. Spencer Miko, Lynn Hoang, David Farnell, Basile Tessier‐Cloutier, Jutta Huvila, Emily F. Thompson, Samuel Leung, Derek S. Chiu, Christine Chow, Monica Ta, Martin Köbel, Lucas Feil, Michael S. Anglesio, Ellen L. Goode, Kelly L. Bolton, Gregg B. Morin, David G. Huntsman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pathology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreCalgary Laboratory ServicesBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Cancer InstituteBC Cancer FoundationOvarian Cancer CanadaTerry Fox Research InstituteCanada Research ChairsVGH and UBC Hospital Foundation
KeywordsProteomeOvarian carcinomaCarcinomaComputational biologyBiologyPathologyCancer researchMedicineOncologyOvarian cancerBioinformaticsInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) is the second most common subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Late-stage CCOC is not responsive to gold-standard chemotherapy and results in suboptimal outcomes for patients. In-depth molecular insight is urgently needed to stratify the disease and drive therapeutic development. We conducted global proteomics for 192 cases of CCOC and compared these with other epithelial ovarian carcinoma subtypes. Our results showed distinct proteomic differences in CCOC compared with other epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes including alterations in lipid and purine metabolism pathways. Furthermore, we report potential clinically significant proteomic subgroups within CCOC, suggesting the biologic plausibility of stratified treatment for this cancer. Taken together, our results provide a comprehensive understanding of the CCOC proteomic landscape to facilitate future understanding and research of this disease. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PathologySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207