Determination of spectral resolutions for multispectral detection of apple bruises using visible/near-infrared hyperspectral reflectance imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study demonstrates a method to select wavelength-specific spectral resolutions to optimize a line-scan hyperspectral imaging method for its intended use, which in this case was visible/near-infrared imaging-based multiple-waveband detection of apple bruises. Many earlier studies have explored important aspects of developing apple bruise detection systems, such as key wavelengths and image processing algorithms. Despite the endeavors of many, development of a real-time bruise detection system is not yet a simple task. To overcome these problems, this study investigated selection of optimal wavelength-specific spectral resolutions for detecting bruises on apples by using hyperspectral line-scan imaging with the Random Track function for non-contiguous partial readout, with two experimental parts. The first part identified key-wavelengths and the optimal number of key-wavelengths to use for detecting low-, medium-, and high-impact bruises on apples. These parameters were determined by principal component analysis (PCA) and sequential forward selection (SFS) with four classification methods. The second part determined the optimal spectral resolution for each of the key-wavelengths by selecting and evaluating 21 combinations of exposure time and key-wavelength bandwidths, and then selecting the best combination based on the bruise detection accuracies achieved by each classification method. Each of the four classification methods was found to have a different optimized resolution for high accuracy bruise detection, and the optimized resolutions also allowed for use of shorter exposure times. The results of this work can be used to help develop multispectral imaging systems that provide rapid, cost-effective post-harvest processing to identify bruised apples on commercial processing lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".