DA EXPANSÃO AO BACKLASH? A CORTE EUROPEIA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS E A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DA EUROPA - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2021v79p287
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUÇÃOEste artigo analisa o desenvolvimento da Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos (CtEDH ou Corte) nas últimas três décadas, desde sua expansão durante os anos 1990 e início dos anos 2000 até a situação atual, em que a Corte tem enfrentado problemas de compliance 2+ e críticas políticas ocasionais.Enquanto muitos concordam que a CtEDH se expandiu drasticamente e aumentou sua autoridade durante a primeira década e meia após o fim da Guerra Fria, a situação atual da Corte é mais contestada.Nem os diagnósticos da situação ou as prescrições resultantes geram consenso, mas há poucas dúvidas de que a Corte vem enfrentando um número crescente de desafios na última década.O ex-presidente da CtEDH, Guido Raimondi, provavelmente fez uma boa avaliação da nova realidade da CtEDH quando identificou dois desafios fundamentais em um discurso
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".