MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DA EXPANSÃO AO BACKLASH? A CORTE EUROPEIA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS E A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DA EUROPA - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2021v79p287

2021· article· pt· W4293703967 on OpenAlexaff
Mikael Rask Madsen, Lucas Carlos Lima, Lucas Mendes Felippe

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOmbudsman and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsOntario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health
FundersDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Research Foundation
KeywordsHumanitiesEuropean unionPolitical sciencePhilosophyBusinessInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2 Embora a expresso "compliance" tenha sido principalmente traduzida por "cumprimento", especialmente em referncia ao cumprimento de sentenas emitidas pela Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos, preferiu-se manter a expresso em lngua inglesa em alguns casos por ela melhor expressar uma srie de comportamentos e mecanismos relacionados obedincia ao sistema e implementao de um tratado ao qual um Estado se engaja a cumprir. (

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMGSame topicOmbudsman and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207