MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4293719992 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v14n9p38

Impact of Monetary Policy Shocks on the Output Gap in Nigeria

2022· article· en· W4293719992 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Igoni Pedro, Ganiyat Adejoke Adesina-Uthman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonetary policyEconomicsDistributed lagOutput gapExchange rateAutoregressive modelInflation (cosmology)EconometricsOrdinary least squaresInterest rate channelLagGeneralized method of momentsEstimationSeries (stratigraphy)Channel (broadcasting)Interest rateTime seriesMonetary economicsInflation targetingCredit channelStatisticsComputer scienceMathematicsPanel data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper aims to answer the question on whether the output gap is influenced by the transmission of monetary policy shocks. For Nigeria, using database of time series data from the Central Bank of Nigeria and the National Bureau of Statistics (2002M01 to 2018M12), we estimate time series models using Generalized Method of Moments, Autoregressive Distributed Lag and Differenced Ordinary Least Squares estimation techniques. We analyze the empirical results of the 3 considered approaches and the impact of CBN development finance and the naira exchange rate shocks on output gap are found significant. The results, however, show that inflation and interest rate is insignificant in the determination of the output gap. We also identify exchange rate as a significant and relevant transmission channel for monetary policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance→Same topicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact→French-language works237,207→