MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293733584 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.29.505206

Spatial transcriptomics reveals ovarian cancer subclones with distinct tumour microenvironments

2022· preprint· en· W4293733584 on OpenAlex
Elena Denisenko, Leanne de Kock, Adeline Tan, Aaron B. Beasley, Maria Beilin, Matthew Jones, Rui Hou, Dáithí Ó Muirí, Sanela Bilic, G. Raj K. A. Mohan, Stuart Salfinger, Simon A. Fox, Khaing Pann Witt Hmon, Yen Yeow, Elin S. Gray, Paul A. Cohen, Yu Yu, Alistair R. R. Forrest

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAustralian GovernmentAustralian Cancer Research FoundationMedical Research CouncilCancer Council Western AustraliaGovernment of Western AustraliaConquer Cancer Foundation
KeywordsBiologyCancer researchTranscriptomeOvarian cancerTumour heterogeneityTumor microenvironmentGeneStromaStromal cellCellGenetic heterogeneityCancerGene expressionPhenotypeImmunologyGeneticsImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is characterised by recurrence, chemotherapy resistance and overall poor prognosis. Genetic heterogeneity of tumour cells and the microenvironment of the tumour have been hypothesised as key determinants of treatment resistance and relapse. Here, using a combination of spatial and single cell transcriptomics (10x Visium and Chromium platforms), we examine tumour genetic heterogeneity and infiltrating populations of HGSOC samples from eight patients with variable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. By inferring gross copy number alterations (CNAs), we identified distinct tumour subclones co-existing within individual tumour sections. These tumour subclones have unique CNA profiles and spatial locations within each tumour section, which were further validated by ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing. Differential expression analysis between subclones within the same section identified both tumour cell intrinsic expression differences and markers indicative of different infiltrating cell populations. The gene sets differentially expressed between subclones were significantly enriched for genes encoding plasma membrane and secreted proteins, indicative of subclone-specific microenvironments. Furthermore, we identified tumour derived ligands with variable expression levels between subclones that correlated or anticorrelated with various non-malignant cell infiltration patterns. We highlight several of these that are potentially direct tumour-stroma/immune cell relationships as the non-malignant cell type expresses a cognate receptor for the tumour derived ligand. These include predictions of CXCL10-CXCR3 mediated recruitment of T and B cells to associate with the subclones of one patient and CD47-SIRPA mediated exclusion of macrophages from association with subclones of another. Finally, we show that published HGSOC molecular subtype signatures associated with prognosis are heterogeneously expressed across tumour sections and that areas containing different tumour subclones with different infiltration patterns can match different subtypes. Our study highlights the high degree of intratumoural subclonal and infiltrative heterogeneity in HGSOC which will be critical to better understand resistance and relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it