MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293748046 · doi:10.4314/ijbcs.v16i3.4

Digestibilité in vitro des ressources utilisées dans l’alimentation des ruminants en zone semi-aride du Cameroun

2022· article· fr· W4293748046 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Blama, R. Ziebe, A. Zoli Pagnah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular biologyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cette étude était de déterminer la digestibilité des ressources alimentaires utilisées dans l’alimentation des ruminants en zone semi-aride du Cameroun. Ces ressources alimentaires ont été collectées dans les élevages de bovin puis ramenées au laboratoire. Après séchage à l’étuve, elles ont été broyées, tamisées puis conservées dans des bocaux hermétiquement fermés. Chaque substrat ainsi préparé a été soumis à l’évaluation de la digestibilité in vitro. Après 24 heures d’incubation, les sons de maïs et de sorgho ont produit plus de gaz (p ˂ 0,05) avec respectivement 250,20 ± 10,48 ml/gMS et 245,26 ± 2,83 ml/gMS par rapport aux autres substrats. Le son de maïs présente un taux de digestibilité de la matière organique le plus élevé de 62,57%. Il est suivi des fanes de niébé et d’arachide avec respectivement des taux de digestibilité de 61,38% et 61,16%. La masse microbienne produite après 24 heures d’incubation, donne un classement des substrats autre que la teneur en énergie métabolisable et la production des acides gras volatils. Après le son de sorgho, le son de riz a été le deuxième substrat en termes de masse microbienne produite avec respectivement 312,57 mg et 258,57 mg. Ces données mises à la disposition des éleveurs peuvent faciliter l’utilisation rationnelle des ressources alimentaires, ce qui pourrait améliorer la productivité des ruminants en zone semi-aride du Cameroun.
 The objective of this study was to determine the digestibility of the food resources used in the ruminants feeding in the semi-arid zone of Cameroon. The food resources were collected from cattle farms and then taken to the laboratory. After drying in the oven, these resources were crushed, sieved and then stored in tightly closed jars. Each substrate prepared was subjected to the In vitro digestibility evaluation. After 24 hours of incubation, the maize and sorghum bran produced more gas (p ˂ 0.05) with respectively 250.20 ± 10.48 ml / gDM and 245.26 ± 2.83 ml/gDM compared to other substrates. With regard to organic matter, corn bran was the most digestible substrate with 62.57%, followed by cowpea and peanut fades with 61.38% and 61.16% respectively. The classification of substrates obtained from the microbial mass produced after 24 hours of incubation differs from that obtained from the metabolizable energy. After the sorghum bran, rice bran is the second substrate in terms of microbial mass produced with 312.57 mg and 258.57 mg respectively. Access to these data can facilitate the rational use of locally available food resources. This could improve the productivity of ruminants in the semi-arid zone of Cameroon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Biological and Chemical SciencesSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207