MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4293769233 · doi:10.2196/39232

Combining the HYM (Healthy Young Men’s) Cohort Study and the TRUTH (A Trans Youth of Color Study): Protocol for an Expanded Mixed Methods Study Renewal

2022· article· en· W4293769233 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Danny Azucar, Joshua A. Rusow, Lindsay Slay, Mariam Taiwo, Aracely Rodriguez, Ali Johnson, Sam Calvetti, Deja Wright, Su Wu, Bethany C. Bray, Jeremy T. Goldbach, Michele D. Kipke

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institutes of HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles
KeywordsPsychological interventionTransgenderGerontologyCohortSexual minorityMedicineCohort studyMen who have sex with menStigma (botany)Ethnic groupPsychologyDemographySexual orientationFamily medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PsychiatrySociologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: As we enter the fifth decade of the AIDS epidemic, health researchers and AIDS activists reflect both on the progress that has been made and the importance of continued prevention efforts for those most at risk. As HIV infection rates continue to fluctuate across communities, a trend has emerged with new HIV infections becoming increasingly concentrated-with cascading effects-among people aged <30 years, from marginalized racial and ethnic groups, and who are sexual or gender minorities. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we discuss the renewal of the Healthy Young Men's (HYM) Cohort Study and the addition of a subcohort-TRUTH: A Transgender Youth of Color Study. The overarching aim of our renewed study was to inform new intervention strategies; understand linkage to care; and examine changes over time with respect to minority-related stress and intersectional identities and their relationship with substance use, mental health, and HIV risk. Findings from this study will help to inform the development of new interventions designed to engage African American and Black and Latino young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and transgender and gender minority youth in the HIV prevention and care continua and to reduce risk by addressing pathways of minority-related stress and intersectional stigma. METHODS: Longitudinal study (baseline and follow-up assessments every 6 months for a total of 8 waves of data collection) is ongoing with reconsented cohort from the last iteration of HYM Cohort Study. This study protocol includes self-report survey, collection of urine to assess recent use of illicit drugs, and collection of blood and rectal and throat swabs to test for current sexually transmitted infection and HIV infection. An additional sample of blood and plasma (10 mL for 4 aliquots and 1 pellet) is also collected and stored in the HYM Cohort Study biorepository for future studies. This mixed methods study design includes collection of triangulated analysis of quantitative, qualitative, and biological measures (ie, drug use, sexually transmitted infection and HIV testing, and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among participants who are HIV+) at baseline and every 6 months. RESULTS: As of February 2022, participants from the past 4 years of the HYM Cohort Study and TRUTH: A Transgender Youth of Color Study Cohort have been reconsented and enrolled into the renewal period of longitudinal data collection, which is projected from summer of 2020 until summer of 2025. Recruitment is ongoing to reach our target enrollment goal of YMSM and transgender minority youth. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study are being used to inform the development of new, and adaptation of existing, evidence-based HIV prevention interventions designed to engage populations of transgender and gender minority youth and YMSM in the HIV prevention and care continua. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/39232.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.065
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0650.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.419
GPT teacher head0.668
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy→French-language works237,207→