MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293790326 · doi:10.3390/en15166005

Synthesis of 3D Nanonetwork Si Structures via Direct Ultrafast Pulsed Nanostructure Formation Technique

2022· article· en· W4293790326 on OpenAlexafffund
Nishant Singh Jamwal, Amirkianoosh Kiani

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceSiliconNanostructureSemiconductorPicosecondOptoelectronicsBand gapUltrashort pulseLaserNanotechnologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon is one of the most used semiconductor materials around the world. This research was conducted on silicon to improve its opto-electrical properties including bandgap and optical conductivity using direct ultrafast pulsed nanostructure formation (DUPNF). The power and frequency of high-intensity picosecond laser pulses were varied, and nanostructures were formed. The optical properties were examined using optical spectroscopy in both VIS and NIR. The structural characteristics were examined using EDX and SEM imaging. It was found that varying the power and frequency of the laser processing caused a change in the bandgap, as well as the structural characteristics of the silicon semiconductor. Increasing the frequency and power showed the formation of nanostructures of silicon and their variation in the properties of the formed nanostructures. The critical breakdown field of the silicon nanostructures was higher than the bulk silicon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207