Flujo de fluido MHD a través de un medio poroso de permeabilidad periódica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se ha considerado el flujo totalmente desarrollado de un fluido magneto-reológico a través de un medio poroso no isotrópico delimitado por placas paralelas bajo el efecto de un campo magnético externo. La permeabilidad se toma como una función periódica de la dirección transversal al flujo. La ecuación Darcy-Brinkman-Lapwood-Lorentz para el flujo de fluidos en medios porosos se ha utilizado y resuelto en condiciones de frontera no deslizante por el método de series de potencia y los resultados han sido validados por el método numérico del disparo. Por último, el análisis de los resultados se hace sobre la influencia en la velocidad, flujo volumétrico y el esfuerzo de deformación del fluido en la pared teniendo en cuenta la relación de viscosidad efectiva de Ochoa-Tapia y Whitaker.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".