Territorios virtuales en el eslabón de la violencia de género en México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los territorios virtuales son escenarios culturales mediados por la tecnología, que construyen patrones de relación y universos de valor que permean en lo cotidiano en sociedades hiperconectadas. El impacto que generan en lo individual y colectivo, es un fenómeno que amerita ser estudiado para la intervención preventiva y de atención a la violencia de género exacerbada y visible en México, según datos oficiales. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el escenario tecnológico como un territorio que genera vulnerabilidad visible desde las prácticas generadas y poca regulación, y que se vincula a la creciente violencia de género en México. Se identifica que la masificación e impacto, ha generado un lazo comunicante entre las experiencias en entornos virtuales con los altos niveles de violencia de género en el país; reconociendo que estos escenarios virtuales, ameritan intervención sistémica que desnaturalice la violencia de género y abone a la construcción de nuevas narrativas y modelos de relación desde sus representaciones y permisividades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".