MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MFVP: Mobile-Friendly Viewport Prediction for Live 360-Degree Video Streaming

2022· article· en· W4293794975 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Zhang, Weizhen Xu, Donghuan Lu, Laizhong Cui, Jiangchuan Liu

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersShenzhen UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsViewportComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Quality of experienceReal-time computingAdaptation (eye)Mobile deviceArtificial intelligenceComputer networkQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viewport prediction is the crucial task for viewport-adaptive 360-degree video streaming. Various viewport prediction methods are studied and adopted from less accurate statistic tools to highly calibrated deep neural networks. Conventionally, it is difficult to implement sophisticated deep learning methods on mobile devices, which have limited computation capability. In this work, we propose an advanced learning-based viewport prediction approach and carefully design it to introduce minimal transmission and computation overhead for mobile terminals. We further discuss how to integrate this mobile-friendly viewport prediction (MFVP) approach into the adaptive 360-degree video live streaming by formulating and solving the bitrate adaptation problem. Extensive experiment results show that our prediction approach can work in real-time for live streaming and can achieve higher accuracies compared to other existing prediction methods on mobile clients, which, together with our proposed bitrate adaptation algorithm, significantly improves the streaming Quality-of-Experience (QoE) from various aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207