MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards Joint Loss and Bitrate Adaptation in Realtime Video Streaming

2022· article· en· W4293795260 on OpenAlexafffund
Dayou Zhang, Kai Shen, Fangxin Wang, Dan Wang, Jiangchuan Liu

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCancer Research FoundationInnovation and Technology FundNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaGlaucoma Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer sciencePacket lossQuality of experienceNetwork packetVariable bitrateDynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTPComputer networkQuality of serviceMultimediaReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent years have seen booming development of realtime streaming services, highly improving user experience in remote work, online education, and entertainment. Unlike video-on-demand (VoD) or live services, realtime streaming service has extremely stringent delay requirements, rendering the TCP-based transmission no longer applicable. Existing works based on UDP (or its variants) either suffer from the packet loss problem or only focus on improving several QoS metrics, which cannot achieve satisfactory user QoE. Our insight is to slightly sacrifice the bitrate and video quality to trade for the most significant delay to maximize the overall QoE. We propose Oppugno‡‡Oppugno is a spell in Harry Potter that makes magical creatures attack the caster. It is a metaphor that we use an additional mechanism to mitigate the influence of packet loss., an integrated framework that achieves joint loss adaptation and bitrate adaption towards maximized QoE in realtime streaming services. Oppugno leverages existing UDP mechanisms and employs an advanced deep reinforcement learning algorithm Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), to adaptively select optimal actions based on network conditions. Trace-driven experiments demonstrate the superiority of our framework, which outperforms the SOTA work by 3.9% ∼ 11.6%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207