MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293797888 · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2022.927137

Delayed instabilities of water-retaining earth structures

2022· article· en· W4293797888 on OpenAlexafffund
Irene Olivia Ubay-Anongphouth, Marolo Alfaro

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Built Environment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsInstabilityGeotechnical engineeringCreepSlope stabilityGeologyCementation (geology)EngineeringForensic engineeringMaterials scienceMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aging earth fill dams that were constructed in the mid-1950’s are beginning to show signs of instability associated with time-dependent degradation of shear strength. The strength degradation can be attributed to fissures, leaching of cementation, and creep in highly plastic clays, among other issues. The time-dependent processes are being examined in an earth fill dam that experienced slope instability but did not result in a loss of water. This paper discusses research findings on the mechanisms of delayed slope instability of an earth fill dam. Identifying the operating mechanisms of instability is useful in developing sound and practical remedial measures. It is also a useful way of being more proactive on the part of engineers in assessing the stability of dams at other generating stations that may not satisfy modern dam safety standards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Built EnvironmentSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207