Supraorbital whiskers act as wind-antennae in rat anemotaxis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We know little about mammalian anemotaxis, wind-sensing. Recently, however, Hartmann and colleagues showed whisker-based anemotaxis in rats. To investigate how whiskers sense airflow, we tracked whisker tips in anesthetized or cadaver rats under no airflow, low airflow and high (fan-blowing) airflow. Whisker tips showed little movement under no airflow conditions and all whisker tips moved during high airflow. Low airflow conditions – most similar to naturally occurring wind stimuli – engaged whisker tips differentially. Most whiskers moved little, the long supraorbital whisker showed maximal displacement and α, A1, β, and γ whiskers also showed movements. The long supraorbital whisker differs from other whiskers in its exposed dorsal position, upward bending, length and thin diameter. Ex vivo extracted long supraorbital whiskers also showed exceptional airflow displacement, suggesting whisker-intrinsic biomechanics mediate the unique airflow-sensitivity. Micro computed tomography revealed that the ring-wulst – the follicle structure receiving the most sensitive afferents – was more complete/ closed in supraorbital and other wind-sensitive whiskers than in non-wind-sensitive whiskers, suggesting specialization of the supraorbital for omni-directional sensing. We localized and targeted the cortical supraorbital whisker representation in simultaneous Neuropixels recordings with D/E-row whisker barrels. Responses to wind-stimuli were stronger in the supraorbital whisker representation than in D/E-row barrel cortex. We assessed the behavioral significance of whiskers in an airflow-sensing paradigm. We observed that rats spontaneously turn towards airflow stimuli in complete darkness. Selective trimming of wind-responsive whiskers diminished airflow turning responses more than trimming of non-wind-responsive whiskers. Lidocaine injections targeted to supraorbital whisker follicles also diminished airflow turning responses compared to control injections. We conclude that supraorbital whiskers act as wind antennae. New and Noteworthy Animals rely on sensory processing of airflow (anemotaxis) to guide navigation and survival. We examined mechanisms of rat anemotaxis by combining whisker tracking, biomechanical analysis, micro computed tomography of follicle structure, Neuropixels recordings in the barrel field, behavior of airflow turning and whisker interference by trimming and lidocaine injections. This diversity of methods led to a coherent pattern of results. Whiskers greatly differ in their airflow sensitivity and strongly wind-responsive whiskers – in particular long supraorbital whiskers – determine behavioral responses to airflow stimuli in rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".