MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293810860 · doi:10.4000/adsc.773

Didactique, sémantique et métaphores : analyse de langages en classe de géométrie

2016· article· en· W4293810860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de didactique et de sciences cognitives · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Class (philosophy)Symmetry (geometry)Semantics (computer science)PragmaticsEpistemologySociologyMathematics educationPsychologyLinguisticsComputer scienceMathematicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work focuses on the role taken by different forms of language during the first academic experience of symmetry by young children, in the context of primary school in France. We pay special attention to. A situation of introduction of symmetry in a class of CE1 (grade 7 or 8 years) was observed to this purpose. This paper aims to provide our analysis of this situation, which are grounded into a didactical theoretical framework enriched with semantic, discursive and metaphorico-conceptual analysis tools. This original approach allows us to understand the symmetry in all its complexity and to analyze finely the inter-influence of three dimensions (acting-talking-thinking) that characterize both the mathematical activity of the students and of the teacher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it