MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293811845 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3203163

CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3-D Object Detection From LiDAR Point Clouds

2022· article· en· W4293811845 on OpenAlexaff
Hai Wu, Jinhao Deng, Chenglu Wen, Xin Li, Cheng Wang, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCascadePoint cloudComputer scienceLidarObject detectionArtificial intelligenceDetectorConvolutional neural networkObject (grammar)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D object detection from LiDAR point clouds has gained great attention in recent years due to its wide applications in smart cities and autonomous driving. Cascade framework shows its advancement in 2D object detection but is less investigated in 3D space. Conventional cascade structures use multipleseparatesub-networks to sequentially refine region proposals. Such methods, however, have limited ability to measure proposal quality in all stages, and hard to achieve a desirable performance improvement in 3D space. This paper proposes a new cascade framework, termed CasA, for 3D object detection from LiDAR point clouds. CasA consists of a Region Proposal Network (RPN) and a Cascade Refinement Network (CRN). In CRN, we designed a new Cascade Attention Module that uses multiple sub-networks and attention modules to aggregate the object features from different stages and progressively refine region proposals. CasA can be integrated into various two-stage 3D detectors and improve their performance. Extensive experiments on KITTI and Waymo datasets with various baseline detectors demonstrate the universality and superiority of our CasA. In particular, based on one variant of Voxel-RCNN, we achieve state-of-the-art results on the KITTI dataset. On the KITTI online 3D object detection leaderboard, we achieve a high detection performance of 83.06%, 47.09%, and 73.47% Average Precision (AP) in the moderate Car, Pedestrian, and Cyclist classes, respectively. Code is available at https://github.com/hailanyi/CasA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207