MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293834778 · doi:10.36660/abc.20220470

“Let’s Keep Pushing the Envelope”

2022· editorial· en· W4293834778 on OpenAlexaff
Vitor Guerra

Bibliographic record

VenueArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnvelope (radar)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Canal Arterial foi a primeira cardiopatia congênita a ser tratada cirurgicamente em 1938 e recentemente voltou aos holofotes do cenário da cardiologia pediátrica pela possibilidade de tratamento percutâneo em uma população muito vulnerável, os recém-nascidos prematuros e com baixo peso. Aliás, o tópico canal arterial e prematuridade nunca saiu do radar dos neonatologistas e cardiologistas pediátricos, pois sempre foi um desafio o tratamento e, inúmeros trabalhos randomizados, foram feitos para responder questões quanto a melhor forma de tratar e [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArquivos Brasileiros de CardiologiaSame topicCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207