Application of a multi-objective optimization model for the design of Piano Key Weirs with a fixed dam height
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Piano Key Weirs (PKWs) have recently been used as new or rehabilitation options in the world because of their advantages in hydraulic performance and construction costs. However, designing an efficient PKW is challenging due to a large and complex set of geometric and hydraulic parameters. Therefore, reaching an optimal PKW design depends on the examination of various geometric combinations and hydraulic parameters. In this study, we applied a multi-objective optimization model known as Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II to determine an optimal design by maximizing hydraulic discharge while minimizing the volume of the concrete. Here, we evaluated the capability of our approach in two separate case studies, one which represented as a rehabilitated weir and other as a new design. Both studies show that the developed approach could significantly reduce the concrete volume per unit of discharge. Moreover, the results show similar patterns in terms of the hydro-economic behavior of the model, which were discussed in three distinguished regions. The unique characteristics of these regions were elaborated, and their most cost-effective values of design parameters were identified. Finally, we discussed how the proposed model and findings of this study could be used for improving the preliminary design of PKWs in practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it