Comparison of Different Intelligent Reflective Surface Designs in terms of Beam Properties at Sub-Terahertz Frequencies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Terahertz (THz) communication is one of the remarkable topics in the field of communication. Terahertz communication, which is one of the promising topics in meeting the rapidly increasing number of devices and the need for data speed and channel capacity, aims to increase the wireless communication frequency band up to terahertz level. When the terahertz frequency is used the wavelength decreases significantly, which causes electromagnetic waves to be more affected by the channel effects. There must be a clear line of sight (LOS) between the transmitter and the receiver in THz communication systems and the electromagnetic wave sent must be highly directive. The use of intelligent reflective surfaces in the terahertz band can provide advantages in the reflected wave being more directive. In this study, different Intelligent Reflective Surface designs in the literature are implemented and a performance comparison is presented in terms of beam characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it