MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293863195 · doi:10.1109/siu55565.2022.9864775

Classification of Moving Ground Targets Using Measurement from Accelerometer on Road Surface

2022· article· en· W4293863195 on OpenAlex
İsmail Can Büyüktepe, Alı Köksal Hocaoǧlu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 30th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineAccelerometerClassifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)k-nearest neighbors algorithmRoad surfaceRandom subspace methodComputer visionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an algorithm that can classify human and car has been developed by using vibration signals obtained from a three-axis accelerometer sensor station placed on three different floors. Data were collected over soil, asphalt and concrete ground. As classifiers, k-Nearest Neighbor classifier (k-NN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers are used. Using classifiers alone limits classification performance. A two-stage classifier model has been proposed to improve the classification performance. The classifier model, which is proposed in two stages, detects the presence of motion in the first stage. In the second stage, it performs the classification of moving targets. As a result of the experimental studies, it has been shown that the proposed two-stage classifier model improves the performance in solving the problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it