Natural Language Processing-Based Product Category Classification Model for E-Commerce
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In scope of the great dynamism that the world of e-commerce gained with the post-pandemic changes on customer behavior, extending the customer’s time on site has become much more valuable. With regards to creating a better understanding of the online shopper’s intent on site, an effective search engine is the best tool for improving the user experience. A useful search engine needs to produce fast results and do intent analysis of customers correctly to present successful recommendations. In this study, BERT, ELECTRA and RoBERTa which are language models that give successful results in similar problems and pre-training libraries in Turkish languages are used for developing text classification and customer intent analysis models based on e-commerce product categories. The results of these deep learning models, which were optimized using the product description and comment libraries of the selected e-commerce brand, are shared in a comparative way, and the results of our e-commerce end-user intent analysis model, which was tested on user search history, were detailed on the basis of product category. The developed model can be used for e-commerce product prioritization in Turkish language, as well as creating an infrastructure for the development of intent analysis models that are able to predict as far as the main product that the user wants to display in searches containing multiple products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it