MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293863347 · doi:10.1109/siu55565.2022.9864959

Collective Success Measure and Analysis in Gamification

2022· article· en· W4293863347 on OpenAlex
Fahrettin Ay, Sefa Sari, Selin Bostan, Umit Bostanci, Mustafa E. Kamaşak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 30th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Cluster analysisTerm (time)Hierarchical clusteringComputer scienceStatisticsEconometricsMathematicsData miningPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the performance scores of the couriers who participated in a gamification project that is actively used in cargo transportation are analyzed and a method is developed to measure the performance scores of the units to which these employees are affiliated. Depending on the developed method, the long-term performance scores of the units are analyzed and negative structural performance breaks detected on three different dates are reported. Then, using the agglomerative clustering method, the units are divided into five different clusters according to their long-term performance changes. As a result, it is observed that clusters are affected by the structural breaks that is occurred in the first two dates at almost the same rate, and after the third structural break, they are inversely affected depending on the their average performance level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it