Liking Status Estimation Using EEG Signals and Mode Decomposition Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emotion estimation is a very important and popular research area from human-computer interaction point of view. In this study, a liking estimation method is proposed by using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals for neuromarketing applications. The liking status is estimated by using signal processing and machine learning methods applied to EEG recordings taken while the subjects watched the advertisement videos of two different car brands. After viewing videos, the participants were asked to give ratings from 1 to 5 while they are presented the picture of 7 car sections (front view, console, side view, rear view, stop lamp, logo and front grille) taken from the advertisement video. EEG segments corresponding to these regions were analyzed by Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition (MEMD) method. Various features were calculated from the extracted intrinsic mode functions (IMF) and liking status classification was performed. The successful results show that the proposed MEMD-based method may be used in neuromarketing studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it