MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293868523 · doi:10.1109/ims37962.2022.9865341

Design and Optimization of T-Coil-Enhanced ESD Circuit with Upsampling Convolutional Neural Network

2022· article· en· W4293868523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilSpace mappingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectronic circuitElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T-coils are widely used in high-speed electrostatic discharge (ESD) circuits to increase bandwidth. Like many other RF/microwave devices, T-coil modeling relies on time-consuming electromagnetic (EM) simulations, which precludes quick design space exploration and fast global optimization. In this paper, a machine learning (ML) model is presented to replace EM T-coil simulations, thereby accelerating T-coil design and optimization. Given the geometry of a T-coil layout, the ML model can infer its S-parameters from 100 MHz to 100 GHz nearly instantly. Finally, this ML model is incorporated into a genetic algorithm (GA), affording a 10× speed improvement in the optimization of a T-coil-enhanced ESD circuit in a 22nm FD-SOI CMOS process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it