MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293868757 · doi:10.1109/ims37962.2022.9865460

Dual-Input Digital Predistortion of Millimeter-Wave RF Beamforming Arrays Driven by Two Non-Contiguous Intra-band Signals

2022· article· en· W4293868757 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Ben Ayed, Yushi Cao, Patrick Mitran, Slim Boumaiza

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredistortionBasebandAdjacent channel power ratioBeamformingMulti-band deviceElectronic engineeringRadio frequencyComputer scienceEffective radiated powerAmplifierPhysicsAntenna (radio)EngineeringTelecommunicationsCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a dual-input single-output (DISO) digital predistortion (DPD) scheme to mitigate the nonlinearity in millimeter-wave RF beamforming arrays when driven by two non-contiguous intra-band signals. Starting from a pass-band Volterra series expression, the paper derives a complex baseband DISO DPD model to linearize the behaviour of RF beamforming arrays under such multi-carrier signal excitation. The proposed DPD scheme is then validated in measurements on a 64-element array driven by two 200 MHz orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing signals centered at 27.5 GHz and 28.5 GHz, and configured to radiate two simultaneous beams to serve two users located at θ = −20° and θ =18.5°, respectively. Measurements show excellent linearization results allowing for an increase in effective isotropic radiated power by more than 4 dB compared to no DPD while maintaining an error vector magnitude lower than 2% and an adjacent channel power ratio higher than 41 dBc in both frequency channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2022Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207