Bagaimana Mempertahankan Kualitas Produksi UMKM Wilayah Kelurahan Krendang Kecamatan Tambora, Jakarta Barat.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (PkM) ini bertujuan untuk untuk menunjang peningkatan dan pemberdayaan kegiatan usaha skala kecil dan menengah (UMKM) ini adalah untuk lebih meningkatkan pemahaman dan kesadaran peserta akan pentingnya lebih memahami kualitas produksi sehingga diharapkan UMKM dapat kompetitif di pasar. Kualitas sesuai dalam fungsi/penggunaan dimana produk dapat digunakan sesuai maksud/tujuan dan fungsinya. Berorientasi pada pemenuhan harapan konsumen/pelanggan dan kesesuaian dengan kebutuhan. Produk memenuhi spesifikasi kebutuhan dari konsumen, meliputi ketersediaan pengiriman/penyampaian, kehandalan, pemeliharaan, efektifitas biaya. Kegiatan dilakukan hanya dalam bentuk penyuluhan dan pelatihan. Pelaku UMKM yang mengikuti kegiatan ini merupakan pengusaha mikro kecil dan pengelola RPTA Krendang, Wilayah Kelurahan Krendang, Kecamatan Tambora, Jakarta Barat. Peserta penyuluhan dan pelatihan berjumlah 21 orang, dimana para peserta ini sangat antusias mengikuti kegiatan ini, hal ini dapat dilihat pada waktu diskusi tanya jawab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".