MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293916951 · doi:10.54097/hset.v11i.1381

The effect of Calcium and Sodium Intake on Bone Health

2022· article· en· W4293916951 on OpenAlexaff
Xinyi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Science Engineering and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisBone resorptionBone healthBone mineralEndocrinologyInternal medicineCalciumMedicineBone remodelingBone densityCalcium metabolismVitamin D and neurologyPeak bone massHormonePhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone health gets more and more attention in the younger population since the peak bone mass will be achieved during one’s childhood and adolescence. Bone mineral density (BMD), an important indicator, is commonly used to indicate overall bone health. The development of BMD is critical during the growth period, which could contribute to less incidence of osteoporosis as people get old. Osteoporosis is one of the most common bone diseases, which could lead to other health complications. In addition to other factors affecting bone health such as physical activity and hormones, nutrition is the most important factor of bone health. Calcium (Ca) and vitamin D (VD) act hand in hand. The absorption of dietary calcium is highly affected by VD. Different hormones regulate Ca homeostasis and balance in the body. Moreover, bone remodeling is tightly regulated to conserve bone integrity. The bone formation is tightly coupled to the resorption. Dietary intake of sodium (Na) cannot be ignored as well. High intake of Na is negatively associated with bone health. The DASH diet with low sodium intake positively affects bone mineral density to some extent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Science Engineering and TechnologySame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207