The Big Bad Wolf: Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For decades, rheumatologists have recognized that certain patients are at risk for developing life-threatening episodes of systemic hyperinflammation and multiorgan system dysfunction, which was termed macrophage activation syndrome ( MAS ), due to the distinctive finding of highly activated macrophages or histiocytes with hemophagocytic activity seen in tissue.1-3 This clinical picture, including hyperferritinemia; anemia and consumptive coagulopathy; and hepatic, neurologic, and hematologic dysfunction, was proposed by Grom and Passo as well as Ramanan and Baildam to represent a form of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).4,5 Primary HLH consists of several rare recessive disorders, typically presenting in childhood, that collectively represent defects in the perforin cytolytic pathway and lead to profound immune dysregulation.6 Interestingly, several studies have shown that children and adults with MAS occurring in the setting of the Stills spectrum disorders—systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still disease (AOSD)—have a high prevalence of single copy, hypomorphic mutations in the genes encoding perforin ( PRF1 ) or other key proteins in the cytolytic pathway.7-9 While the most common rheumatic condition associated with MAS in pediatric rheumatology is sJIA, MAS is increasingly recognized as complicating childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). However, the mechanisms of MAS specific to patients with cSLE are largely undefined, and whether similar genetic risks are present in these patients has not been carefully examined. In this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology ,10 Lahiry and colleagues describe the prevelance of HLH-related gene variants found in a large, single-center cohort of cSLE. The authors identified 19 patients in the lupus cohort at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto (SickKids) who had been diagnosed with MAS and underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES) and/or whole-genome sequencing (WGS). These were compared to 62 patients with cSLE who had WGS performed for suspected monogenic lupus … Address correspondence to Dr. G.S. Schulert, Division of Rheumatology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45208, USA. Email: Grant.schulert{at}cchmc.org.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".