MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294151582 · doi:10.3390/curroncol29090498

Efficacy of Immunotherapy Combined with Antiangiogenic Therapy in Treatment-Failure Patients with Advanced Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Submandibular Gland: A Case Report

2022· article· en· W4294151582 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huanlan Sa, Yinghui Xu, Xiaobo Ma, Xu Wang, Chao Sun, Shi Qiu, Ye Guo, Zhiguang Yang, Yunpeng Liu, Kewei Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jilin Province
KeywordsMedicineCarcinoma ex pleomorphic adenomaSubmandibular glandPleomorphic adenomaCervical lymph nodesAdenomaImmunotherapyCarcinomaRadiation therapyLymphPathologyInternal medicineOncologySalivary glandCancerMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (Ca ex PA) is a rare malignant tumor that arises from a primary or recurrent benign pleomorphic adenoma (PA). Ca ex PA has an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. To date, there are no standardized therapeutic methods. Herein, we reported a case of a 57-year-old Chinese female with Ca ex PA of the submandibular gland. After surgery, cervical lymph nodes recurred, and multiple distant metastases were detected. During the treatment, she received multiple chemotherapies and radiotherapy but suffered from multidrug resistance and repeated disease progression. Hence, PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab), in combination with anlotinib, was administered, which resulted in better control of pulmonary metastases compared to the other treatment regimens. This provided an alternative treatment option for Ca ex PA of the submandibular gland patients with failed multiple therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207