MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294204182 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170535

Application of Anti-Crisis Measures for the Sustainable Development of the Regional Economy in the Context of Doing Local Business in a Post-COVID Environment

2022· article· en· W4294204182 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lіudmyla Zavidna, Olha Тrut, Olha Slobodianiuk, Іryna Voronenko, Віра Іванівна Варцаба

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBusiness and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable developmentCrisis managementCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PopularityRelevance (law)Mechanism (biology)Context (archaeology)BusinessEconomic systemEconomyEconomicsPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of the article is to form a theoretical and methodological mechanism for the application of anti-crisis measures for the sustainable development of the regional economy in the post-COVID environment. For this purpose, it was chosen to separately take the region as an example of the application of the proposed mechanism. The research methodology involves the use of methods for graphical modeling of the mechanisms for making and implementing managerial decisions. The popularity and convenience of the methods make it possible to effectively form the desired mechanisms. The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that the world has finally moved into the post-COVID period of development. COVID-19 has not gone away, but the regional economy must move forward. As a result of the study, a theoretical and methodological version of the possibilities of applying anti-crisis measures for the sustainable development of the regional economy in the post-COVID environment was presented. The study has a number of limitations, and they relate to the lack of opportunities to apply the proposed mechanism to a larger number of regions. Further research should cover more regions and take into account not only the post-COVID conditions of sustainable development but also the Ukrainian-Russian military crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicBusiness and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207