MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294215946 · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2022.08.024

Building interface bonding and shield for stable Li-rich Mn-based oxide cathode

2022· article· en· W4294215946 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jun Chen, Hongyi Chen, Yu Mei, Jinqiang Gao, Alvin Dai, Ye Tian, Wentao Deng, Guoqiang Zou, Hongshuai Hou, Craig E. Banks, Tongchao Liu, Khalil Amine, Xiaobo Ji

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy storage materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Energy EfficiencyBasic Energy SciencesArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyFundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South UniversityNational Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational ResearchFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaOffice of ScienceVehicle Technologies OfficeCentral South UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceAmorphous solidCathodeOxideElectrolyteElectrodeChemical engineeringCoatingOxygenChemical physicsNanotechnologyMetallurgyCrystallographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEnergy storage materialsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207