MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294224603 · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20224801001

Real-Time Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Radar Using Software Defined Radio

2022· article· en· W4294224603 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Gılpın, Joey R. Bray, Mostafa Hefnawi

Bibliographic record

VenueITM Web of Conferences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMORadarElectronic engineeringComputer scienceSoftware-defined radioMultiplexingRadar engineering detailsContinuous-wave radarEngineeringReal-time computingChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsRadar imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, commercially-available software-defined radios (SDRs) are used to build a 64-channel, reconfigurable Active Electronically Scanned Arrays (AESA) radar operating in C-band (NATO G-band). The SDRs are used to design and implement a 3-dimensional multi-input and multi-output (MIMO) radar. The flexibility of the SDRs has been harnessed to evaluate the performance of a linear frequency modulated continuous wave (LFMCW) MIMO radar using three different methods of achieving the orthogonality, namely Time Division Multiplexing (TDM), Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM), and Code Division Multiplexing (CDM). In addition, the radar’s parameters are user-selectable and can be rapidly changed such that the radar can be used in different environments without requiring changes to the hardware. Measurements indicate that the radar is capable of detecting and localizing multiple targets in all 3-dimensions, including bearing, range, and Doppler. The MIMO radar operates in real-time, with a refresh rate of only 3 seconds. Experimental results are generated for the TDM mode of operation with further research reporting on the CDM and FDM modes of operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueITM Web of ConferencesSame topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207