MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294225065 · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20224801010

A Two-Stage Support Vector Machine and SqueezeNet System for Range-Angle and Range-Speed Estimation in a Cluttered Environment of Automotive MIMO Radar Systems

2022· article· en· W4294225065 on OpenAlexaff
Zakaria Benyahia, Mostafa Hefnawi, Mohamed Aboulfatah, Hassan Abdelmounim, Taoufiq Gadi

Bibliographic record

VenueITM Web of Conferences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineRadarWaveformArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Range (aeronautics)Convolutional neural networkFeature extractionComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringTelecommunicationsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a two-stage deep-learning approach for frequency modulated continuous waveform multiple‐input multiple‐output (FMCW MIMO) radar embedded in cluttered and jammed environments. The first stage uses the support vector machine (SVM) as a feature extractor that discriminates targets from clutters and jammers. In the second stage, the angle, range, and Doppler estimations of the extracted targets are treated by the SqueezeNet deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) as a multilabel classification problem. The performance of the proposed hybrid SVM-SqueezeNet method is very close to the one achieved by the SqueezeNet only but with the advantage of identifying the type of targets and reducing the training time required by the SqueezeNet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueITM Web of ConferencesSame topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207