MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294242992 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1860

Prenatal Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence and Developmental Health in Children at Kindergarten: Linking Canadian Population-Level Administrative Data.

2022· article· en· W4294242992 on OpenAlexaffabout
Janelle Boram Lee, Marni Brownell, Tracie O. Afifi, Lorna Turnbull, Marcelo L. Urquía, Nathan Nickel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba HealthUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violencePopulationDemographyCohortMedicinePoison controlCohort studyVulnerability (computing)Logistic regressionChild developmentNeighbourhood (mathematics)Injury preventionPsychologyEnvironmental healthPsychiatryComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ObjectiveUsing population-wide administrative data, the objective was to provide Canadian evidence on the longitudinal relationship between maternal intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization and children’s developmental health. Using provincial prosecution records, we examined developmental vulnerability (DV) at kindergarten of children prenatally exposed to maternal IPV victimization compared to unexposed counterparts. ApproachThis retrospective cohort study linked administrative datasets (legal, health, education, social services) from the Population Research Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Exposed mother-child pairs with 1+ prosecution record of maternal IPV victimization during pregnancy between 2003 and 2018 in Manitoba (n = 1,117) were matched to unexposed pairs (1:3) based on sex/birthdate of child and neighbourhood income. DV at kindergarten was measured across 5 domains (physical, social, emotional, language/cognitive [LC], communication/general knowledge) using the Early Developmental Instrument (EDI). Children without eligible EDI scores were excluded. Multiple logistic regression models were conducted to address the objective. ResultsThe eligible cohort included 927 children (exposed n=229, unexposed n=698); 31.07% of the cohort was developmentally vulnerable in one or more domains (1/+) and 19.53% was developmentally vulnerable in two or more domains (2/+). Children who were prenatally exposed to maternal IPV victimization had increased odds of vulnerability across all 5 developmental domains (e.g., physical health/wellness: OR=2.83[1.95,4.10]; LC development: OR=2.45[1.65,3.64]). Unadjusted ORs showed statistically significant associations between maternal exposure of prenatal IPV victimization and DV in 1/+ (OR=2.70[1.98,3.68]) and 2/+ (OR=2.48[1.75,3.50]). When adjusted for covariates (e.g., maternal income assistance, mental health, child abuse history), no statistically significant relationship was found for any of the domains (e.g., LC development: aOR=0.98[0.53,1.81]), 1/+ (aOR=1.17[0.72,1.88]), and 2/+ (aOR=1.14[0.67,1.95]). ConclusionThe unadjusted, statistically significant associations suggest children exposed to maternal IPV victimization prenatally may face associated social/health risks. The finding highlights the need to consider potential factors that put children at risk of DV when developing and implementing support systems/interventions for children exposed to maternal IPV victimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFrench-language works237,207