MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294293809 · doi:10.4000/pds.10714

Thermalisme dans le Haut Languedoc : l’établissement de Lamalou-le-Bas ou Lamalou-l’Ancien (Hérault)

2022· article· fr· W4294293809 on OpenAlex
Julia Desagher

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePatrimoines du Sud · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsinVentiv Health Clinical
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Située au nord du département de l’Hérault, sur les contreforts de la Montagne Noire, Lamalou-les-Bains naît de l’exploitation de ses sources à l’époque moderne. Si la découverte de sources au Moyen Âge dans un contexte de recherches minières n’est pas pleinement attestée, l’exploitation thérapeutique des sources du coteau de l’Usclade débute dans la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle. Les premiers bâtiments des bains de Lamalou sont construits à l’initiative des seigneurs du Poujol dans la 1re moitié du XVIIIe siècle. L’établissement rudimentaire connait des agrandissements successifs jusqu’au tout début du XXe siècle. Il prend à partir du milieu du XIXe siècle l’appellation de Lamalou-le-Bas pour se distinguer des établissements concurrents nouvellement créés dans le vallon, puis celle de Lamalou-l’Ancien. Après le fort ralentissement de l’activité thermale, l’architecte Adolphe Thiers restaure et modernise l’établissement au milieu du XXe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it