Long-term outcomes of pediatric epilepsy surgery: Individual participant data and study level meta-analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Long-term seizure outcomes of pediatric epilepsy surgery are understudied. A systematic review and independent patient data meta-analysis was performed to study seizure outcomes ≥ 10 years following pediatric resective epilepsy surgery. METHODS: Electronic literature searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL were conducted for relevant articles from inception to April 2020. The following search terms were used in various combinations: "pediatric", "child", "adolescent", "epilepsy", "resective", "surgery", "long-term", "longitudinal", "10 year". Two reviewers (W.B.H., T.B.C.) performed title, abstract, and full-text screening. All relevant perioperative factors reported that may be associated with long-term seizure outcomes were recorded at a study or individual participant level. The primary outcome was long-term (≥ 10 year) seizure freedom measured by the Engel Classification scale, and available data on functional outcomes were also reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles met criteria for inclusion in the study, which were analyzed for proportions of 10-year seizure freedom ranging from 57.6% at the study level to 64.8% at the individual patient level. At the study level, the proportion of patients remaining seizure free at least 10 years postoperatively (61.2%; 95% CI 52.5-69.3) was significantly less than at 1 year (74.2%; 95% CI 69.3-78.6; p = 0.008) but not at 2 years (67.9%; 95% CI 58.6-76.0) or 5 years (63.7%; 95% CI 55.4-71.2). No differences in long-term seizure freedom were detected by etiology or surgery type. At the individual patient level, univariate logistic regression analyses of all variables putatively associated with seizure freedom demonstrated that lobectomy (OR 0.280, 95% CI 0.117-0.651, p = 0.003) was associated with decreased long-term seizure freedom (41.9%) compared to lesionectomy (75.7%) and hemispherectomy (69.4%), which achieved similar results. CONCLUSION: Resective surgery is a durable and potentially curative treatment option for select pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy. On a group level, two-thirds of children have long-term seizure freedom ≥ 10 years after resective epilepsy surgery. Given the greatest rate of change occurs in the first 2 years, this may serve as the best short-term follow-up period to predict long-term outcome. Although lobectomy appears to be a strong predictor for lower likelihood of long-term seizure freedom, long-term prognostication on an individual patient level is still not possible. Uniform data reporting and prospective, multicenter studies collecting high quality, stratified (e.g., by etiology, surgery type) data over an extended postoperative interval are recommended to further examine the durability of resective surgery as a treatment for pediatric epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.079 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.046 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".