MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294527359 · doi:10.1175/jpo-d-22-0047.1

A Predictably Intermittent Rotationally Modified Gravity Current in the Strait of Georgia

2022· article· en· W4294527359 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mina Masoud, Rich Pawlowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGravity currentGeologyBoundary currentEkman layerFroude numberBoundary layerUpwellingTurbulenceOcean currentEntrainment (biomusicology)Current (fluid)OceanographyClimatologyMeteorologyMechanicsPhysicsInternal waveFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Strait of Georgia is a large and deep fjordlike basin on the northeastern Pacific coast whose bottom waters are dramatically renewed by a series of intermittent gravity currents in summer. Here, we analyze a dataset that includes moored observations from 2008 to 2021 and shipborne measurements from a 2018 field program to describe the vertical and cross-channel structure of these gravity currents. We show that the timing of these currents for more than a decade is well predicted by proxy measurements for both tidal mixing strength in the Haro Strait/Boundary Pass region and coastal upwelling on the west coast of Vancouver Island. Renewals occur as an ∼30-m-thick turbid layer extending along the right-hand slope of a broad V-shaped valley that forms the southern end of the strait. Currents are primarily along-isobath at speeds of up to 20 cm s −1 with a small downhill component. A diagnostic analytical model with a depth-dependent eddy viscosity is fitted to the observations and confirms a clockwise rotation of current vectors with height, partly driven by boundary layer dynamics over a scale of a few meters and partly driven by Coriolis forces in the near-bottom linear density gradient. Bottom drag and (small) entrainment parameters are similar to those found in other oceanic situations, and the current is “laminar” with respect to large-scale instabilities (with Froude number ≈1 and Ekman number ≈0.01), although subject to turbulence at small scales (Reynolds number of ∼10 6 ). The predictability and reliability of this accessible rotationally modified gravity current suggests that it is an ideal geophysical laboratory for future studies of such features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical OceanographySame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207