MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294527394 · doi:10.1063/5.0108020

A new compact active turbulence generator for premixed combustion: Non-reacting flow characteristics

2022· article· en· W4294527394 on OpenAlexafffund
Sajjad Mohammadnejad, Leslie Saca, Sina Kheirkhah

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFortisBCCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsPhysicsTurbulenceDissipationTurbulence kinetic energyMechanicsKinetic energyGenerator (circuit theory)Flow (mathematics)Root mean squareClassical mechanicsThermodynamicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new compact active turbulence generator is developed, tested, and characterized, which extends the capabilities of such generators used in turbulent premixed combustion research. The generator is composed of two blades that resemble the shape of two bow-ties. Hot-wire anemometry and high-speed imaging are performed to characterize the non-reacting flow produced by the generator and the blades dynamics, respectively. Two mean bulk flow velocities of 5.0 and 7.0 m/s are examined. For comparison purposes, in addition to the developed generator, tests are also performed for a free jet as well as one and two perforated plates. The results show that the centerline root mean square velocity fluctuations can become as large as 1.8 m/s. For the newly developed device, the power-law decay of the one-dimensional kinetic energy is −1.0 and −1.3 for the mean bulk flow velocities of 5.0 and 7.0 m/s, respectively. The normalized energy dissipation rate is relatively small for the newly developed device, while the energy dissipation rate is relatively large. The spectral analysis of the velocity data does not show dominant frequencies equal to the blades rotation frequencies, and the one dimensional kinetic energy and dissipation spectra follow −5/3 and 1/3 power-law relations, respectively. It is shown that the small eddies produced by the newly developed device dissipate the turbulent kinetic energy faster than those corresponding to the rest of the tested turbulence generators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207