MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4294590041 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.10128

Explicit description of all deflators for market models under random horizon with applications to NFLVR

2018· preprint· en· W4294590041 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tahir Choulli, Sina Yansori

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrincipal (computer security)Mathematical economicsSet (abstract data type)MathematicsFlow (mathematics)CombinatoricsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers an initial market model, specified by its underlying assets $S$ and its flow of information $\mathbb F$, and an arbitrary random time $τ$ which might not be an $\mathbb F$-stopping time. As the death time and the default time (that $τ$ might represent) can be seen when they occur only, the progressive enlargement of $\mathbb F$ with $τ$ sounds tailor-fit for modelling the new flow of information $\mathbb G$ that incorporates both $\mathbb F$ and $τ$. In this setting of informational market, the first principal goal resides in describing as explicitly as possible the set of all deflators for $(S^τ, \mathbb G)$, while the second principal goal lies in addressing the No-Free-Lunch-with-Vanishing-Risk concept (NFLVR hereafter) for $(S^τ, \mathbb G)$. Besides this direct application to NFLVR, the set of all deflators constitutes the dual set of all "admissible" wealth processes for the stopped model $(S^τ,\mathbb G)$, and hence it is vital in many hedging and pricing related optimization problems. Thanks to the results of Choulli et al. [7], on martingales classification and representation for progressive enlarged filtration, our two main goals are fully achieved in different versions, when the survival probability never vanishes. The results are illustrated on the two particular cases when $(S,\mathbb F)$ follows the jump-diffusion model and the discrete-time model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.071 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)→Same topicStochastic processes and financial applications→French-language works237,207→