Preliminary paleopalynology of the Kanguk Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Remus Creek, Canadian Arctic Archipelago: I. Marine Palynomorphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 39 m section of the Kanguk Formation (Upper Turonian to Lower Campanian) on Remus Creek, Ellesmere Island, was sampled at about one inetre intervals to provide stratigraphic control on palynomorph taxa present. These samples yield well-preserved marine and terrestrial palynofloras represented by a total of 181 taxa, of which 103 are dinocysts and acritarchs and represent 51 % of the population. Based on the abundance and type of taxa present the section can be divided into a lower, dinocyst dominated interval, and an upper interval, where dinocysts are present in lower numbers and terrestrial palynomorphs dominate. In the lower part dinocysts are abundant, diverse and well-preserved. Chorate cysts are the most abundant in terms of species diversity and numbers of specimens, however, cavate dinocysts are common also. In turn, in the upper part of the section, marine palynomorphs are much less common, poorly preserved and sporadic in occurrence. Acritarchs account for a small but significant proportion of the marine assemblages. Small numbers of taxa of Albian-Cenomanian age are considered to be reworked from the underlying Hassel Formation. This indicates an unconformity between the Hassel and Kanguk formations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it