MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294622505

Habermas pour penser les pathologies sociales réellement existantes

2016· preprint· fr· W4294622505 on OpenAlexaff
France Aubin

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le texte, tiré d'une conférence, s’inspire en partie d’un ouvrage paru en 2016 aux PUQ sur les perspectives critiques en communication (Aubin et Rueff, dir.). J’y ai commis un petit chapitre sur Habermas et je reprends ici une partie de la section qui porte sur l’opérationnalisation de certains concepts en communication. Dans l’ouvrage, je m’étais limitée à proposer des pistes de recherche en lien avec l’espace public. Ici, j’intègre des réflexions liées à la théorie discursive de la morale, mieux connue sous le nom d’éthique de la discussion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.013
Scholarly communication0.0110.014
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0100.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political TheoryFrench-language works237,207