Research on the mechanism of bed agglomeration and superheater fouling in <scp>CFB</scp> boiler fired pure petroleum coke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Circulating fluidized bed combustion is an effective method for the clean and efficient utilization of high‐sulphur petroleum coke. In the actual production and operation process, there are serious problems of bed agglomeration and superheater fouling. The chemical and mineral compositions of the deposition were analyzed by X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and X‐ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), and the effects of CaO sulphation and V 2 O 5 on bed agglomeration and superheater deposits were studied through targeted experiments. The research results show that the sulphation process of CaO is the cause of bed agglomeration, and the superheater fouling is the result of the combined action of K 2 SO 4 condensation and CaO sulphation; V 2 O 5 in petroleum coke ash catalyzes the oxidation reaction of SO 2 to accelerate the sulphation of CaO, thereby accelerating the development of bed agglomeration and superheater fouling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".