MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294636058 · doi:10.5267/j.uscm.2022.7.009

The effects of dynamic employee capabilities, fintech and innovative work behavior on employee and supply chain performance: Evidence from Vietnamese financial industry

2022· article· en· W4294636058 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuan Thang Phan, Hoai Nam Ngo, Thùy Linh Nguyễn, Duc Tai Pham, Ngoc Chan Truong, Ngoc Anh Pham, Thi Thu

Bibliographic record

VenueUncertain Supply Chain Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVietnameseBusinessSupply chainScope (computer science)Financial servicesWork (physics)Service (business)MarketingFinanceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FinTech has become a popular term which describes novel technologies adopted by the financial service institutions. This term covers a large scope of techniques, from data security to financial service deliveries. An accurate and up-to-date awareness of FinTech has an urgent demand for both academics and professionals. The goal of the study is to assess the impact of dynamic employee capabilities on fintech applications, employees’ innovation work behavior, thereby creating employee performance and supply chain finance performance for financial institutions in Vietnam. The data was collected through 189 mid-level managers of 189 financial institutions in Vietnam. The results of analysis using SPSS and Smart PLS software show that dynamic employee capabilities had a positive impact on fintech application, employees’ innovative work behavior and improve employee performance while improving supply chain finance performance of financial institutions in Vietnam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUncertain Supply Chain ManagementSame topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFrench-language works237,207