The effects of fast delivery, accidental management and top management on sustainable logistics growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the current study is to examine the effect of fast delivery and accidental management on sustainable logistics growth. The study examined the relationship between fast delivery, accidental management, top management and sustainable logistics growth. Top management is used as a moderating variable. In this study, the Thai logistic companies are investigated, therefore, the population of the study is on logistics companies of Thailand. Data were collected from the employees of logistics companies to examine the effect of fast delivery, accidental management and top management on sustainable logistics growth. A survey was carried out and 450 questionnaires were distributed among the employees. Results of the study show that sustainable logistics growth is the most important for the logistics companies influenced by the fast delivery, accidental management and top management. Fast delivery has a positive effect on sustainable logistics growth. Increase in fast delivery increases the sustainable logistics growth. Moreover, accidental management also has a positive effect on sustainable logistics growth. Better accidental management has a positive role to enhance sustainable logistics growth. Additionally, top management also shows a positive role in sustainable logistics growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".