A 21-Year Time Series of Global Leaf Chlorophyll Content Maps From MODIS Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is an important plant physiological trait and is critical for accurate modeling of vegetation photosynthesis over time and space. To date, there is still a lack of a global long time-series dataset of LCC. In this study, we developed an algorithm to retrieve global LCC from MODIS surface reflectance data from 2000–2020. An essential requirement for generating LCC time series is to capture its seasonal dynamics. This issue was addressed by using a matrix system with two pairs of vegetation indices to minimize the impacts of leaf area index and canopy non-photosynthetic material on LCC estimation in different seasons. The matrix system algorithm was applied to Landsat data and MODIS data, respectively. The validation based on Landsat data and ground measurements reveals the algorithm has the ability to catch the seasonal variations of LCC in different plant functional types, and the MODIS-derived LCC shows good agreement with Landsat-upscaled LCC (R2=0.77, RMSE=6.9 μg/cm2). The global 8-day LCC data at 500-m resolution in 2000–2020 was generated using the matrix system from MODIS and presented distinct temporal and spatial variations, which provides a new opportunity for analyzing vegetation physiological dynamics in climate change studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".