Path-Based Approach for Expanding Rail Transit Network in a Metropolitan Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rail transit network design is an important strategic problem in determining the layout of infrastructure and improving operating performance. A core transit network with multiclass rail transit systems has been constructed in many metropolitan areas worldwide. In this study, we aimed to expand an existing network to shorten travel time and improve service quality under the restriction of limited transport supply. We formulate the studied problem as a mixed-integer linear model to obtain optimal construction links, the number of trains required on each link, and the path selected by each traveler such that the weighted sum of total costs from the perspective of travelers, operators, and investors is minimized. The formulated model is path-based, where feasible paths for each traveler are generated to describe the full door-to-door journey, including the first/last mile, transfers, and multiclass transit modes. Owing to the complexity of the network design problem and because it is impractical to enumerate all feasible paths for each traveler in real-size problems, we propose a column generation-based algorithm to find both tight lower bounds and good-quality solutions efficiently by considering only a subset of feasible paths. We prove that the pricing subproblem in column generation can be decomposed into multiple shortest path problems, which can be solved efficiently and separately, based on O/D pairs instead of individual travelers. A rail transit network along a metropolitan corridor was studied as an example. Multiple computational experiments were conducted, and the results illustrate the validity and practicality of the proposed methodology for solving the problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".