MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294680146 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac174.233

P11.44.A The impact of heme biosynthesis regulation on glioma aggressiveness: correlations with most recent diagnostic molecular markers

2022· article· en· W4294680146 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Mischkulnig, Barbara Kiesel, T Rötzer-Pejrimovsky, Martin Borkovec, Alexandra Lang, Matthias Millesi, Lisa I. Wadiura, Shawn L. Hervey‐Jumper, Josef Penninger, M S Berger, Georg Widhalm, Friedrich Erhart

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaBiologyHemeBiosynthesisCancer researchGeneGeneticsBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The prognosis of patients with diffusely infiltrating gliomas is dismal but varies greatly between individuals. While characterization of gliomas was primarily relied on typical histopathological features, specific molecular markers increasingly gained importance and play a key role in the recently published 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Heme biosynthesis represents a crucial pathway due to its key role in oxygen transport, energy production or drug metabolism. Recently, we described a “heme biosynthesis mRNA expression signature” that correlates with histopathological glioma grades and patient survival. The aim of the current study was to correlate the heme biosynthesis mRNA expression signature with the most recent diagnostic molecular markers for glioma stratification. Material and Methods In this study, patient data were derived from the “The Cancer Genome Atlas” (TCGA) lower-grade glioma and glioblastoma cohorts. We identified diffusely infiltrating gliomas correlating molecular tumor diagnosis according to the most recent WHO classification with heme biosynthesis mRNA expression. The following molecular markers were analyzed: EGFR amplification, TERT promoter mutation, CDKN2A/B homozygous loss, concurrent chromosome 7 gain/10 loss, MGMT methylation, IDH mutation, ATRX loss, p53 mutation and 1p19q co-deletion. Subsequently, we calculated the heme biosynthesis mRNA expression signature and correlated this signature with distinct molecular glioma markers as well as the resulting molecular subgroups. Results A total of 649 patients with available data on up-to-date molecular markers and heme biosynthesis mRNA expression were included. According to analysis of individual molecular markers, we found a significantly higher heme biosynthesis mRNA expression signature in gliomas with IDH wildtype (p<0.0005), without 1p19q co-deletion (p<0.0005), with homozygous CDKN2A/B loss (p<0.0005) and with EGFR amplification (p=0.001). Furthermore, we observed that the heme biosynthesis mRNA expression signature increased with the aggressiveness of the molecular subgroups (p<0.0005), being lowest in WHO grade 2 oligodendrogliomas and highest in WHO grade 4 glioblastomas. Conclusion Our data demonstrate a significant correlation between diagnostic molecular markers and heme biosynthesis regulation in diffusely infiltrating gliomas. Consequently, heme biosynthesis expression is a promising biomarker for glioma aggressiveness and might constitute a potential target for novel therapeutic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207