MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294704101 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2007p0677

Suspension Plasma Spraying of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrolytes

2007· article· en· W4294704101 on OpenAlexaff
D. Waldbillig, Olivera Kesler, Z. Tang, A. Burgess

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePorositySolid oxide fuel cellMicrostructureSuspension (topology)Solution precursor plasma sprayYttria-stabilized zirconiaThermal sprayingCubic zirconiaCoatingElectrolyteDeposition (geology)PlasmaGas dynamic cold sprayPlasma electrolytic oxidationComposite materialOxideChemical engineeringMetallurgyCeramicChemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Suspension plasma spraying is a promising modification to traditional plasma spray techniques that may allow plasma sprayed layers with finer microstructures and better porosity control to be produced. The fine microstructures and controlled porosity of these layers, combined with plasma spraying’s ability to produce layers rapidly without requiring a post-deposition heat treatment, makes this an interesting new manufacturing method to produce solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) active layers. This study uses an axial injection suspension plasma spray system to produce thin, high-density layers of fully stabilized yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) for use as an SOFC electrolyte. Three different aqueous feedstock suspensions with varying solid contents were sprayed, which resulted in coatings with splat thicknesses of approximately 0.5 µm and some intersplat porosity. Total coating thickness increased as the suspension solid content was increased, but suspension flow rates and deposition efficiencies decreased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal spraySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207