Unprecedented formation of reactive BrO– ions and their role as mediators for organic compounds degradation: The fate of bromide ions released during the anodic oxidation of Bromophenol blue dye
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Based on the existing literature, active chlorine‐mediated electrochemical oxidation has been extensively studied when Cl ‒ is added or Cl ‒ is already present in the water matrices, as well as when Cl ‒ is released from the target organic pollutants during their degradation. However, no attempts have been published concerning the fate and role of bromide (Br ‒ ) ions released during the anodic oxidation (AO) of organobromine compounds. Therefore, the AO of bromophenol blue dye (BPB) was investigated in a parallel plate flow reactor using a boron‐doped diamond (BDD) anode. The effect of the applied current on the color removal efficiency and mineralization of BPB solution was examined and compared with AO of phenol red (PR) which has a similar molecular structure to BPB (but without Br) in order to understand the role of Br heteroatoms on the mineralization of BPB. Faster and higher mineralization and discoloration were achieved when treated with BPB solution compared to PR under similar experimental conditions. This behavior was associated with the electrogeneration of BrO ‒ , from the heteroatom Br which is released as the bromide ion (Br ‒ ), during the degradation of BPB. The active bromine species are formed via direct and indirect oxidation approaches which were proposed based on ion chromatography and linear scanning voltammetry analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".