Altered biventricular function in neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a case–control echocardiographic study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, more profound altered right and left ventricular function has been associated with mortality or brain injury. Mechanisms underlying cardiac dysfunction in this population are thought to be related to the persistence of increased pulmonary vascular resistance and myocardial ischaemia. We sought to compare cardiac function in newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy to controls using echocardiography. METHODS: We did a retrospective case-control study with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy between 2008 and 2017. Conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography measures were extracted to quantify right and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Fifty-five newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy were compared to 28 controls. RESULTS: Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy newborns had higher estimated systolic pulmonary pressure (62.5 ± 15.0 versus 43.8 ± 17.3 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure/systolic blood pressure ratio [101 ± 16 (iso-systemic) versus 71 ± 27 (2/3 systemic range) %, p < 0.0001]. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was decreased (7.5 ± 2.2 versus 9.0 ± 1.4 mm, p = 0.002), E/e' increased (7.9 ± 3.3 versus 5.8 ± 2.0, p = 0.01), and right ventricle-myocardial performance index increased (68.1 ± 21.5 versus 47.8 ± 9.5, p = 0.0001) in hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Conventional markers of left ventricle systolic function were similar, but e' velocity (0.059 ± 0.019 versus 0.070 ± 0.01, p = 0.03) and left ventricle-myocardial performance index were statistically different (77.9 ± 26.2 versus 57.9 ± 11.2, p = 0.001). The hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy group had significantly altered right and left ventricular deformation parameters by speckle-tracking echocardiography. Those with decreased right ventricle-peak longitudinal strain were more likely to have depressed left ventricle-peak longitudinal strain. CONCLUSION: Newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy have signs of increased pulmonary pressures and altered biventricular systolic and diastolic function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".